· Dimora Luxury· 7 min read →

Case Study: Milan Penthouse - From Concept to Completion

Case Study: Milan Penthouse - From Concept to Completion

A full account of the project: how we developed the concept, chose the furniture, and coordinated deliveries from 4 different factories.

The brief was deceptively simple: a 280 m2 penthouse in central Milan, recently stripped back to its shell, waiting to become something exceptional.

The client - a Milanese entrepreneur - had one clear instruction: it must feel Italian, but not obviously so. No Baroque. No pastiche. Just the quiet confidence of great design.

The plan came before the furniture

We began with the floor plan, which is where a project of this kind is won or lost. The space had generous ceiling heights, 3.4 m throughout, and a south-facing terrace that we wanted to connect visually to the living room rather than treat as an outdoor room reached through a door.

The structural solution was to open the wall entirely and use a custom sliding glass system by Lualdi. That single decision set the rest of the brief. With the terrace reading as part of the living room, the furniture had to be low enough not to interrupt the view, the floor finish had to continue without a threshold detail that would break the line, and the lighting had to work against glass at night instead of against a wall.

Ceiling height of 3.4 m is a gift and a trap. A room that tall makes standard furniture look stranded, and it makes ordinary ceiling lighting useless - at that distance a downlight lands as a hard pool rather than as illumination. Both problems are solved at the plan stage or not at all.

Four factories, one language

For furniture we built the brief around four factories, divided by what each does best: Poliform for the kitchen and the master wardrobe system; Molteni&C for the dining table and the master bedroom; Minotti for the living room sofas and occasional tables; Flos for all lighting.

Dividing a project by discipline rather than by room is deliberate. Wardrobe and kitchen systems are configured to the millimetre and have to be drawn into the architecture, so they come from the factory with the best systems. Upholstery is about comfort and silhouette and comes from the factory whose seats suit the client. Lighting is a technical specification first and an aesthetic one second. Mixing brands inside a single room is where interiors look assembled from a magazine; mixing them by discipline is how they look coherent.

Four factories is also a scheduling problem

This is the part clients do not see and the part that decides whether a handover date survives. Four suppliers mean four production times, four quality checks and four transport schedules, and they do not align by themselves.

The method is simple enough to state and tedious to execute. Order against the longest lead time, not the average. Identify the pieces that other trades depend on - the kitchen, the wardrobe systems, anything an electrician or a stonemason has to work around - and get those confirmed first, because a four-week delay on a wardrobe is a four-week delay for the plasterer too. Keep one delivery window per supplier rather than accepting part-deliveries, which multiply the number of times someone has to be on site. And secure storage near the project before the first crate ships, because a penthouse under finishing work cannot receive a dining table.

The details that did the heavy lifting

Three decisions carried more of the result than their cost suggests.

The lighting was planned in layers rather than as a ceiling grid: indirect light for the volume, directional light for the places actually used, and low warm light for the evening. In a room with a glass wall, that last layer is what stops the window becoming a black mirror after sunset.

The wardrobe system was specified as architecture, with doors flush to the wall, so a wall of storage reads as a wall. In an apartment of this size the amount that has to be out of sight is substantial, and the only alternative to integrated storage is visible clutter.

The dining table was chosen as the anchor of the open plan, which is why it came from the factory whose tables define rooms. In a space where living room, dining and terrace read as one volume, that table is the object that tells you where the room's centre is.

Eight months, in order

The result took eight months from first concept to final delivery, in this order: measured survey and plan options; visualisation of the rooms as they would really be; specification and quotation against that; orders placed against the longest lead time; production; delivery, assembly and snagging.

The client's feedback at handover was simply: "It feels like it was always here."

What we would tell a client starting the same project

Decide the plan before you fall in love with any object. Fix the lighting layout before the walls are closed, because that is the one thing that cannot be retrofitted quietly. Order the systems that other trades depend on first. And accept that made-to-order furniture means the schedule, not the selection, is the hard part of the job.

If you have a space at the shell stage and a date you want to live in it, send us the plan. We will set out the sequence, the realistic production times from the factories we work with directly, and a quotation on request.

Dimora Luxury

Ready to discuss your project? We work with clients worldwide.

Discuss your project→